Online Now 901

Off The Reservation

The place to discuss general topics outside of Florida State

On this Board 16
Record: 231 (3/13/2012)

Online now 798
Record: 5859 (2/14/2012)

Boards ▾

Unconquered

The place to talk about the Florida State Seminoles

Off The Reservation

The place to discuss general topics outside of Florida State

Reply

Ok Religious folks, question for you

  • As long as your not trying to convert me or murder me, believe in whatever you want I don't care. peace

    signature image signature image signature image

    Kenny Powers: "A true champion will do whatever it takes to rise above. Because surrender is death, and death is for pussies."

    Noles3925

  • trumpetman_03 said...

    Tolerance is a word many don't quite understand. Agreement and tolerance are not the same. When tolerance is used in relation to Christianity, many people believe Christians should accept other peoples' beliefs; this is not true to the definition of the word. The Bible, the basis of Christianity, says "I [Jesus] am the Way, the Truth and the Light. No one shall come to the Father except through me." This alone states that if you believe in Christianity, you believe it is the only way to Heaven and the only proper faith. However, as many have stated the Bible states many times to love you neighbor as yourself, to not judge others or you too shall be judged, that nobody is perfect, and God loves everyone regardless of their beliefs, lack thereof, or sins. To tolerate other religions/views as a Christian does not mean to agree/accept, but to love and care for that person regardless of their views. The Bible says, "Love the sinner, hate the sin." This can relate to several instances especially with different religions, views, and sexual orientation. One may disagree with your sexuality and lifestyle, but they should still care for you have no ill feelings toward you. This is not conveyed regularly; however, so many take the stance of claiming Christians as being intolerant because they disagree with you; same goes the other way, why can't you be tolerant of the Christians views. It goes both ways.

    The problem, of course, is what constitutes Christian belief?
    Some think a vow of poverty is needed.
    Some think drinking alcohol and dancing is a sure trip to hell.
    Other's think reading certain material should be banned.
    Some think contraception is contra-Christian behavior.
    The examples are never ending.

    If you read the bible literally you have to ignore large sections in order to live in our society [unless stoning to death is something you want to take part in!].

    Now here is the kicker; Christian beliefs are no different in kind to any other religious belief.
    People have been killed over all religious beliefs [including Buddhism], all beliefs leave behind large sections of previous tenets as society changes [progresses?], and religious leaders are regularly shown to have "feet of clay."

    Good discussion, but I reject the Christian exceptionalism that permeates it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    fsufool

  • fsufool said...

    The problem, of course, is what constitutes Christian belief? Some think a vow of poverty is needed. Some think drinking alcohol and dancing is a sure trip to hell. Other's think reading certain material should be banned. Some think contraception is contra-Christian behavior. The examples are never ending.

    If you read the bible literally you have to ignore large sections in order to live in our society [unless stoning to death is something you want to take part in!].

    Now here is the kicker; Christian beliefs are no different in kind to any other religious belief. People have been killed over all religious beliefs [including Buddhism], all beliefs leave behind large sections of previous tenets as society changes [progresses?], and religious leaders are regularly shown to have "feet of clay."

    Good discussion, but I reject the Christian exceptionalism that permeates it.

    I don't like the "Christian" word.

    It implies a favoring of one religious belief over another, and that is not entirely fair.

    For instance, I have a friend who is Muslim, that dude is the guy i would call at 2am if I was drunk at a bar and needed a ride, or the guy I would talk to if everything went to crap. Always there, and tries to do the right thing, good family guy, trustworthy. If I did not tell you he was Muslim, you would think of him being a "Christian".

    But we all know, Muslims can't be Christians...right?

    fishing

    Pbenuncensored26482

  • fsufool said...

    The problem, of course, is what constitutes Christian belief? Some think a vow of poverty is needed. Some think drinking alcohol and dancing is a sure trip to hell. Other's think reading certain material should be banned. Some think contraception is contra-Christian behavior. The examples are never ending.

    If you read the bible literally you have to ignore large sections in order to live in our society [unless stoning to death is something you want to take part in!].

    Now here is the kicker; Christian beliefs are no different in kind to any other religious belief. People have been killed over all religious beliefs [including Buddhism], all beliefs leave behind large sections of previous tenets as society changes [progresses?], and religious leaders are regularly shown to have "feet of clay."

    Good discussion, but I reject the Christian exceptionalism that permeates it.

    When looking at any religion, you have to look at its founder and doctrinal documents. Followers of religions are flawed and in some ways support a need for a "savior". I think we can all agree that we (humans) being naturally self-centered like to pick and choose things in which we want to believe, follow, etc. So it is no surprise that you have multiple religions, denominations, crazy sects within religions etc. But a multiple of major religions that survived thousands of years tells me that "something/Someone" is reaching out to us.

    If you want to compare religions you MUST look at the founder of that religion and the doctrinal documents that started the religion. When you look at the example the founder lived by and the doctrinal texts, you will get a better understanding of the intent of the religion. I recommend reading it for yourself versus getting an "experts" take on something. An expert’s opinion/take should supplement your own reading/research/understanding.

    It is very important to note that there can be differences that have no "eternal" significance (being baptized by being sprinkled by water versus dunked in water) but issues arise when there are eternal differences. In Christianity, accepting that Jesus died for our sins and rose on the third day is the ONLY criteria to get to Heaven. This is clearly seen in Jesus’ teachings and the doctrinal texts. The crazy stories in the Bible are "physical representations of spiritual principles" that God has used to teach us about the consequences for sin. This can be explained in a different post if anyone is interested.

    Now on the issue of belief, a person can say, "I don't believe fire burns." But as soon as they stick their hand in the fire, the truth is revealed despite his/her belief. So I believe a truth exists (one religion is correct or there is nothing after life - I believe there is eternal life after death). So on the issue of religion, one of these religions has to be correct if there is indeed "something after life". If you don't believe anything exists, that is your prerogative and you will either go into nowhere after death or meet with whatever religion is true. Either way, the truth will be made known at death if you don't discover it during life. Keep in mind that all of the religions cannot be true because they are in conflict with one another. One says do this to reach enlightenment, another says this to get to Allah, and Christianity says there is no way to Heaven except through your belief in Jesus. So one religion has to be correct or there is nothing after death. This is the gamble we are all faced with and I believe everyone will be faced with this decision sometime in their life if not multiple times.

    This brings up why I believe Christianity is the "truth". This is because Christianity is the only religion that says you don't have to physically do anything to be "saved", it has already been done (Jesus death and resurrection). All you have to do is "believe in your heart" that He died in your place and that He rose from death. That belief alone gets you to Heaven. Going to church, praying, reading your Bible cannot get you to Heaven. Instead, you do these things because you are saved already and now want to get to know God better. It doesn’t exempt you from poverty, turmoil and even death. What it does do is reconcile you with a God that loves you but could not be in a relationship with you because of our sin. It was Jesus’ sacrifice that allowed for reconciliation to take place and for us to have eternal life.

    signature image signature image signature image

    FSUNoleFSUx0137

  • FSU*Nole said...

    When looking at any religion, you have to look at its founder and doctrinal documents. Followers of religions are flawed and in some ways support a need for a "savior". I think we can all agree that we (humans) being naturally self-centered like to pick and choose things in which we want to believe, follow, etc. So it is no surprise that you have multiple religions, denominations, crazy sects within religions etc. But a multiple of major religions that survived thousands of years tells me that "something/Someone" is reaching out to us.

    If you want to compare religions you MUST look at the founder of that religion and the doctrinal documents that started the religion. When you look at the example the founder lived by and the doctrinal texts, you will get a better understanding of the intent of the religion. I recommend reading it for yourself versus getting an "experts" take on something. An expert’s opinion/take should supplement your own reading/research/understanding.

    Very nice post. However, that is your interpretation and it does conflict with what many "churches" preach. Me, I would go with what you said. However, I am very sure we are in a minority when it comes to this.

    You might be surprised at how much cross-over there is in the original doctrines of the various religions!

    This post was edited by fsufool on 3/3/2012 at 10:05 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    fsufool

  • The Christian word came about as a slur not a word of entitlement. After CHrist died (so to speak) all that followed him were persecuted and called CHristians in a mocking undertone not in the sense it is used now. It was embraced as a word to be prideful of b/c to be called a Christian meant to be a follower of Christ and CHrist said that to be persecuted on earth because of my name meant we were following his law and righteousness.

    nolzn charge

  • I think a key aspect to the belief in Christianity is the bible and when you learn how the bible was put together and by whom it seems like taking anything in it literally is incredibly dangerous. Not to mention that the most widely read bible is a translation of a translation (and probably more like a translation of a translation of a translation). How many things have been "lost in translation" i.e. misconstrued, taken out of context, left out, or just completely lost by either the people translating or the people who decided what was and wasn't to be included. I'm not saying the what is in the bible isn't the word of "God" but only that maybe the people translating or putting it together made a mistake during the translation or had ulterior motives. How often do we hear about a Christian using his position of influence within his church for something very un-Christian or for money and/or power.

    Edit this is obviously not just limited to Christians and their holy book. The same thing can probably be said of most or all religions though i am less familiar with their origins.

    This post was edited by topnole on 3/3/2012 at 12:49 PM

    topnole

  • Interesting to see everyone has their own definition of their respective faiths. Would like to see someone of a creed other than Christianity jump in here.

    EnterTheOcho

  • fsufool said...

    Very nice post. However, that is your interpretation and it does conflict with what many "churches" preach. Me, I would go with what you said. However, I am very sure we are in a minority when it comes to this.

    You might be surprised at how much cross-over there is in the original doctrines of the various religions!

    I totally agree that what I said earlier is in conflict with a lot of the Christian churches. The scariest verse in the Bible for me is Matthew 7:22-23. It says, “Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!” Forget about the people doing bad things in Jesus name. Jesus is saying that there are people doing “great” things in His name and they will not go to heaven. This goes back to my point that we need to seek a “personal” relationship with Jesus so we can “know Him”. Here is an example, we all “know” Jimbo Fisher in the same sense that these people in the Bible verse “knew” Jesus. We know a little about him, his family, know what he looks like etc. We even probably from time to time defend him when people bad mouth Jimbo. But we don’t “know” Jimbo the way Jesus calls us to “know” Him. Even though Jesus is omniscient, he uses the term “know” to explain the personal relationship aspect. So the fact that many churches are in conflict with my previous post is explained in the verse I just quoted.

    In response to other religions having crossover, I agree as well. While attending FSU, I took the world religions class that brought in Hindu, Rabbis, etc to teach the particular religion. This was fascinating because we were learning from the actual believers of the particular religion. I found that Christianity was the only religion I couldn’t poke holes in the founder or original documents (with the exception of the followers which is true for all religions, groups, etc). I asked myself, “Why wouldn’t there be overlap?” The reason why they are so attractive is that they do relate to the “ultimate truth” but at the end of the day, isn’t the truth. At the end of the day, I cannot prove/disprove my faith just as any other faith cannot prove/disprove their faith. I did not become a Christian until the second semester of my freshman year at FSU. But after looking at all of them, it would take more faith for me not to believe in Christianity.

    Unfortunately, it makes sense that this way of thinking would be in the minority because God values our free will more than a desire for Him to force us to want to believe in Him and have a personal relationship with Him. I can see this with my relationship with my 4 and 2 year olds. I want them to love me and follow my guidance because they want to, not because they have to. Unfortunately, when they stray from my guidance, they will have to live with the consequences. I truly believe God treats us the same way.

    signature image signature image signature image

    FSUNoleFSUx0137

  • topnole said...

    I think a key aspect to the belief in Christianity is the bible and when you learn how the bible was put together and by whom it seems like taking anything in it literally is incredibly dangerous. Not to mention that the most widely read bible is a translation of a translation (and probably more like a translation of a translation of a translation). How many things have been "lost in translation" i.e. misconstrued, taken out of context, left out, or just completely lost by either the people translating or the people who decided what was and wasn't to be included. I'm not saying the what is in the bible isn't the word of "God" but only that maybe the people translating or putting it together made a mistake during the translation or had ulterior motives. How often do we hear about a Christian using his position of influence within his church for something very un-Christian or for money and/or power.

    Edit this is obviously not just limited to Christians and their holy book. The same thing can probably be said of most or all religions though i am less familiar with their origins.

    I believe there will always be individuals who misuse anything and because the influence of religion, the misuse/abuse is always there and in some ways, greater. This is why a personal relationship is important in Christianity. I can sit and listen to a preacher but it would be foolish to take everything he/she says as gospel (no pun intended). For the Christian, we must weigh things against the Bible and then determine for ourselves if this is in alignment with the Bible.

    The great thing about the Bible is that there are subtle differences in minor descriptions but not major differences in “eternal” aspects of various versions, translations, etc. If they all said the exact thing, it would lead one to think there was a conspiracy. The fact that the important items are described almost verbatim and the less important items differ somewhat shows that this event has been documented properly. Here is an example; we probably all saw the bowl game against Notre Dame. We will describe how the events happened differently from one another (how the o-line played, did ND give up, etc) but the “concrete” items will not change (who we played against, the final score, where it was played, etc).

    The funny thing is that the Bible (Old and New Testament) point to one person (Jesus). The stories were written in over 60 books over years and years but as I read them and take in the “whole story”, it says to me that there is a God who has been reaching out to us and despite ourselves; He provided a way out and still wants to be in relationship with us.

    signature image signature image signature image

    FSUNoleFSUx0137

  • Pben-uncensored said...

    This is a great post.

    Basically don't judge people, and accept them for what they are, I believe thats not only Christian but the way human beings should act.

    Call me crazy.

    I would tend to say this is the bottom line. Way too much hate in this world.

    CRon_T

  • Pben-uncensored said...

    If someone proclaims themself a "Christian", doesn't that include tolerance for other peoples beliefs as well?

    I am a recovering Catholic and two key things:

    Not tolerant

    It's allabout the $

    delawarenole

  • CRon_T said...

    I would tend to say this is the bottom line. Way too much hate in this world.

    100% agree

    delawarenole

  • So I am in the middle of the Nole game sunday..the doorbell rings.

    Now keep in mind, I hate answering the door (usually send the 4 yr old) and the ph (usually a telemarketer, again the 4yr old). So seeing how I was home alone, I get up an answer it, and its this lady with the jehovahs witnesses.

    She starts her pitch, and i cut her off (politely) halfway through it.

    "Can i ask you a serious question?"

    "Why yes, please do" (they are so polite)

    "Does this really work on anyone?"

    "What do you mean?"

    "Selling your religion door to door, does it work?"

    "I am not sell.."

    "Yes you are selling, and you are not doing well, know why?"

    "Why?"

    "Because it is 1:30 on a sunday, and most people are engaged in leisure activity and really do not want to be bothered, and to be honest the only reason we are chatting at all, is because I have a dvr and can pause my game, since your interests to not conflict with my interests i wish you the best of luck." (i watched the Godfather saturday night, so i borrowed)

    Pbenuncensored26482

  • To sum up what Jesus preached can be found in the book of Job, chapter 42
    After Job lost everything and went through all that he did, he came to know God
    Job stated "I knew of You, but now I know You."
    Job had everything in material possessions before he went through all that he did and lost everything
    After he lost everything he came to know God, not just know of God
    God then restored to Job much more than he had before his great loss
    In Psalm 103, verse 7 it tells us that God made His acts know unto the children of Israel, but unto Moses God made known His ways
    There is quite a difference between knowing about God and actually knowing God in a personal relationship

    Seminole5000

  • Pben-uncensored said...

    If someone proclaims themself a "Christian", doesn't that include tolerance for other peoples beliefs as well?

    It is this "tolerance" that will ultimately be our undoing. When people lose their morals they lose their freedom b/c you must have gov't. to come in and do what people did on their own at one time. It is my firm belief that this is the main reason Christians are so roundly attacked in modern Amerika these days.

    Another thing, Pben mentioned his muslim "friend". How can you believe anything a person who worships a book that preaches reward for killing/lying to/stealing from non-believers (which is one time Christians/atheiest/agnostics/Catholics are all on the same page) says? This will never happen until it's too late, but if we were smart (not really all that smart b/c the proof is worldwide right before our eyes) we'd outlaw islam and rid ourselves of them ASAP. Nothing good ever comes w/ allowing the immigration of a cancer into one's body.

    levynole

  • I don't like anyone proselytizing period. I feel very strongly that religion and one's beliefs are personal.

    I am Episcopalian, have studied the 4th way and teachings of Gurdieff, and consider myself a zen Christian.

    I will admit that I am somewhat intolerant of Islam, and I do not see it as a "religion of peace", unlike Buddhism, for example.

    farnsworth

  • farnsworth said...

    I don't like anyone proselytizing period. I feel very strongly that religion and one's beliefs are personal.

    I am Episcopalian, have studied the 4th way and teachings of Gurdieff, and consider myself a zen Christian.

    I will admit that I am somewhat intolerant of Islam, and I do not see it as a "religion of peace", unlike Buddhism, for example.

    Some people may and have chosen to keep their beliefs/religion personal. For the Christian, it clearly states that we should spread the Gospel to the whole world. For the Christian, living a life without Jesus is similar to watching someone driving 100 mph towards a cliff and the driver being totally unaware. The Christian sees the impending danger and wants to let the person know that they are heading for danger and they need to change course before it is too late. So I can see how we sometimes get a little overzealous sometimes.

    The issue sometimes is how the Gospel message is shared. Most people are turned away from religion because of how the message is delivered. But you have to remember that 1+1 =2 no matter who says it or how they say it. Someone could even yell at you in a demeaning way saying, “1 + 1 = 2.” But how they say it doesn’t take away from the fact that 1+1 will always equal 2.

    The Christian MUST present the message in a loving way but not listening to them because of the presentation seems foolish as well (Ignoring someone who is yelling at you because you are about to drive off a cliff.)

    In this case, both sides should leave emotion out of the equation (no pun intended) to ensure that a clear decision can be made. Not forced…but willingly made

    signature image signature image signature image

    FSUNoleFSUx0137