-
trumpetman_03 said...
Tolerance is a word many don't quite understand. Agreement and tolerance are not the same. When tolerance is used in relation to Christianity, many people believe Christians should accept other peoples' beliefs; this is not true to the definition of the word. The Bible, the basis of Christianity, says "I [Jesus] am the Way, the Truth and the Light. No one shall come to the Father except through me." This alone states that if you believe in Christianity, you believe it is the only way to Heaven and the only proper faith. However, as many have stated the Bible states many times to love you neighbor as yourself, to not judge others or you too shall be judged, that nobody is perfect, and God loves everyone regardless of their beliefs, lack thereof, or sins. To tolerate other religions/views as a Christian does not mean to agree/accept, but to love and care for that person regardless of their views. The Bible says, "Love the sinner, hate the sin." This can relate to several instances especially with different religions, views, and sexual orientation. One may disagree with your sexuality and lifestyle, but they should still care for you have no ill feelings toward you. This is not conveyed regularly; however, so many take the stance of claiming Christians as being intolerant because they disagree with you; same goes the other way, why can't you be tolerant of the Christians views. It goes both ways.
-
fsufool said...
The problem, of course, is what constitutes Christian belief? Some think a vow of poverty is needed. Some think drinking alcohol and dancing is a sure trip to hell. Other's think reading certain material should be banned. Some think contraception is contra-Christian behavior. The examples are never ending.
If you read the bible literally you have to ignore large sections in order to live in our society [unless stoning to death is something you want to take part in!].
Now here is the kicker; Christian beliefs are no different in kind to any other religious belief. People have been killed over all religious beliefs [including Buddhism], all beliefs leave behind large sections of previous tenets as society changes [progresses?], and religious leaders are regularly shown to have "feet of clay."
Good discussion, but I reject the Christian exceptionalism that permeates it.
Pbenuncensored26482
- 5 stars Rating: 86
1090 votes total - (1790)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
fsufool said...
The problem, of course, is what constitutes Christian belief? Some think a vow of poverty is needed. Some think drinking alcohol and dancing is a sure trip to hell. Other's think reading certain material should be banned. Some think contraception is contra-Christian behavior. The examples are never ending.
If you read the bible literally you have to ignore large sections in order to live in our society [unless stoning to death is something you want to take part in!].
Now here is the kicker; Christian beliefs are no different in kind to any other religious belief. People have been killed over all religious beliefs [including Buddhism], all beliefs leave behind large sections of previous tenets as society changes [progresses?], and religious leaders are regularly shown to have "feet of clay."
Good discussion, but I reject the Christian exceptionalism that permeates it.
FSUNoleFSUx0137
- 5 stars Rating: 94
58 votes total - (159)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
FSU*Nole said...
When looking at any religion, you have to look at its founder and doctrinal documents. Followers of religions are flawed and in some ways support a need for a "savior". I think we can all agree that we (humans) being naturally self-centered like to pick and choose things in which we want to believe, follow, etc. So it is no surprise that you have multiple religions, denominations, crazy sects within religions etc. But a multiple of major religions that survived thousands of years tells me that "something/Someone" is reaching out to us.
If you want to compare religions you MUST look at the founder of that religion and the doctrinal documents that started the religion. When you look at the example the founder lived by and the doctrinal texts, you will get a better understanding of the intent of the religion. I recommend reading it for yourself versus getting an "experts" take on something. An expert’s opinion/take should supplement your own reading/research/understanding.
This post was edited by fsufool on 3/3/2012 at 10:05 AM
-
EnterTheOcho ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1622 votes total - (4344)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
fsufool said...
Very nice post. However, that is your interpretation and it does conflict with what many "churches" preach. Me, I would go with what you said. However, I am very sure we are in a minority when it comes to this.
You might be surprised at how much cross-over there is in the original doctrines of the various religions!
FSUNoleFSUx0137
- 5 stars Rating: 94
58 votes total - (159)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
topnole said...
I think a key aspect to the belief in Christianity is the bible and when you learn how the bible was put together and by whom it seems like taking anything in it literally is incredibly dangerous. Not to mention that the most widely read bible is a translation of a translation (and probably more like a translation of a translation of a translation). How many things have been "lost in translation" i.e. misconstrued, taken out of context, left out, or just completely lost by either the people translating or the people who decided what was and wasn't to be included. I'm not saying the what is in the bible isn't the word of "God" but only that maybe the people translating or putting it together made a mistake during the translation or had ulterior motives. How often do we hear about a Christian using his position of influence within his church for something very un-Christian or for money and/or power.
Edit this is obviously not just limited to Christians and their holy book. The same thing can probably be said of most or all religions though i am less familiar with their origins.
FSUNoleFSUx0137
- 5 stars Rating: 94
58 votes total - (159)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
delawarenole
- 5 stars Rating: 88
336 votes total - (1139)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
delawarenole
- 5 stars Rating: 88
336 votes total - (1139)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Pbenuncensored26482
- 5 stars Rating: 86
1090 votes total - (1790)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
farnsworth said...
I don't like anyone proselytizing period. I feel very strongly that religion and one's beliefs are personal.
I am Episcopalian, have studied the 4th way and teachings of Gurdieff, and consider myself a zen Christian.
I will admit that I am somewhat intolerant of Islam, and I do not see it as a "religion of peace", unlike Buddhism, for example.
FSUNoleFSUx0137
- 5 stars Rating: 94
58 votes total - (159)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Refresh











Ok Religious folks, question for you