-
warchantnoles ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
13 votes total - (33)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
tlhwg
- 5 stars Rating: 82
391 votes total - Sean Millard
- (1167)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Noles247 only. Join now! Subscribe Now
lamarsilverfox
- 5 stars Rating: 95
244 votes total - (531)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
EnterTheOcho ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1622 votes total - (4344)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
warchantnoles ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
13 votes total - (33)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
fsufsu said...
Rashad Greene is obvious. I am still thinking Rodney Smith has a personal best season season to show us. Because of depth he may only get ~35 catches to showcase this year but I think he does the most with his opportunities this year.
And then so many just think since CT4 broke his back he'll likely just be solid but everyone around the program says he's healthy and a man on fire. He's really good guys.
-
warchantnoles ●
- 5 stars Rating: 92
13 votes total - (33)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
googolplex said...
OP is dead on.
At some point in the season, somebody is going to stop your offense: things won't click.
You will need someone who can make a play anyway, someone to make something happen outside the normal rhythm of the offense.
If you don't have this person, there will be at least a couple games where you just don't score that much, where 17 points will beat you. And goodbye national title.
This post was edited by Mass Nole on 5/16/2012 at 1:44 PM
-
seminolelive84
- 5 stars Rating: 84
120 votes total - (216)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
aivlys said...
That's a very good example, and it's why people are namely RG as the candidate. But there is a big difference between RG and a Peter Warrick-very, very big. Maybe he'll make that kind of jump, but as it stands now I don't think we will see that kind of gamechanger next year on offense.
This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by Mass Nole on 5/16/2012 at 2:10 PM
-
Mass Nole said...
Do you remember what P-dub did his freshmen year? First of all he redshirted....his RS FR year he had 22 rec for 467 yards in 11 games. Rashad had better stats in less games...although I will say P-dub was one of the most unbelievable college athletes I've ever seen. I'll hold out hope for Rashad.
-
aivlys said...
That's a very good example, and it's why people are namely RG as the candidate. But there is a big difference between RG and a Peter Warrick-very, very big. Maybe he'll make that kind of jump, but as it stands now I don't think we will see that kind of gamechanger next year on offense.
This post was edited by Bowden4prez on 5/16/2012 at 4:23 PM
-
Bowden4prez said...
There was a very big difference.
PW - 22 catches 467 yards 4 TDs - which led to soph numbers of - 53 catches 884 yards 8 TDs
RG - 38 catches 596 yards 7 TDs ------ SOPHOMORE unknown
I guess my point is, Rashad Greene made more plays, and was a better all round receiver than PW his first year at FSU. To suggest he can't explode his sophomore season like PW did, is a little crazy.
People have foggy memories of these things over the years. What Greene did last season was nothing short of historic at FSU in terms of a true frosh WR.
Rashad Greene reminds me of a Chris Carter. Gets open, makes outstanding grabs, and where it gets tough are those 3rd and 8s, and he is getting open.
To the poster I quoted - you brought up PW - and then said it doesn't compare - remember something. Not many teams were playing zone defense in the mid 90s. In fact, almost none were, and the ones that were, weren't running the sophisticated zone schemes that are around today.
What does that mean? That means PW wouldn't have the same opportunities on the field that he had back then, and was a HUGE reason why he didn't live up to his hype in the NFL. When bracketed, the kid had to use his explosion in and out of cuts, and run outstanding routes. The zone was invented for players like PW, and the reason you don't see that same type of playmaking ability anymore.
This post was edited by aivlys on 5/16/2012 at 5:19 PM
-
SavannaBandana
- 5 stars Rating: 86
69 votes total - (112)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars

To win a NC you must have a game changer on offense