-
ZZ1059 said...
6. It will cost between $20M and $25M to leave the ACC we have no idea
where that money would come from. It would have to come from the Boosters
which currently are unable to support our current University athletic
budget, hence the 2% cut in that budgetThis needs to change!
"Sometimes when you bring the thunder, you get lost in the storm." -Kenny Powers
-
InsightTexas said...
At a minimum, FSU would be playing UT or OU every year and it would make huge sense for FSU to be in a division with one of them and playing the other as a designated rival each year. Even if the division Barron suggests was real, FSU should have a cake walk to the final 4. He conveniently leaves out the likely reality that 1 to 3 other ACC teams would likely be following FSU to the Big 12.
The travel nonsense is a total canard. FSU would have no problem negotiating a subsidy for the difference between their ACC travel and Big 12 travel. The Big 12 teams would also be traveling to play WVU, FSU and any other ACC members who join.
The true test of a man's intelligence is how much he agrees with you.
-
TerpsSoccer
- 4 stars Rating: 70
3192 votes total - (1728)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
InsightTexas said...
If this is a real letter from Barron, it is an unprofessional and one sided disgrace. I hate to confuse this nonsense with reality but
1. So what? You gave up your third tier rights for much less money than the Big 12 in an ACC contract that does not get to $17 million until 2021.
2. So what? If FSU stays in the ACC, EVERY TEAM IN THE SEC may be getting $10 million+ more than FSU. UT's only advantage is outside Tier 1 & 2 rights and are only an advantage because of the value of the UT franchise. UT's football team is 13-12 over the last two seasons and they only have two conference football championships in the 14 years since Brown arrived so they clearly do not know how to translate $ into championships. Nebraska and A&M were the big advocates for unequal revenue sharing on Tiers 1 & 2 which has disappeared since they left.
3. $2.9 million? Barron conveniently ignores the severe escalation curve and the much longer term of the ACC deal as well as the targets that have to be met to trigger the $17 million. He also leaves out the step up Big 12 teams would receive from adding FSU and other teams, the championship game add on and the reality that attendance would very likely escalate with higher football quality Big 12 teams despite his notions to the contrary.
At a minimum, FSU would be playing UT or OU every year and it would make huge sense for FSU to be in a division with one of them and playing the other as a designated rival each year. Even if the division Barron suggests was real, FSU should have a cake walk to the final 4. He conveniently leaves out the likely reality that 1 to 3 other ACC teams would likely be following FSU to the Big 12.
The travel nonsense is a total canard. FSU would have no problem negotiating a subsidy for the difference between their ACC travel and Big 12 travel. The Big 12 teams would also be traveling to play WVU, FSU and any other ACC members who join.
4. Yeah, right. The attendance would be the same with real quality football teams instead of basketball schools with football teams.
5. There is no reason to give up the UM rivalry to play Murray St. and Savannah St.
6. The exit fee is negotiable with both the ACC and the Big 12 and the long term benefits would far outweigh the cost. TCU and WVU figured that one out even with the existing Big 12 contract that is significantly less than the new one.
7. How is the faculty in any way adversely affected by FSU moving to the Big 12? They might realize a huge benefit from the extra direct or indirect revenue the Big 12 would bring. How does staying in the ACC solve any of FSU budget issues?
Yes it should be a reasoned decision but it is clear that Barron is inventing canards to justify maintaining the FALSE ILLUSION of higher academic standing for FSU in the ACC.
As an FSU alum, I hope Haggard and the BOT have the stones to ignore Barron if this kindergarten thinking is real.
TerpsSoccer
- 4 stars Rating: 70
3192 votes total - (1728)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TerpsSoccer
- 4 stars Rating: 70
3192 votes total - (1728)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TerpsSoccer
- 4 stars Rating: 70
3192 votes total - (1728)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TerpsSoccer said...
I don't understand or get why fsu fans feel like you been wronged by the acc. Yes its a basketball first league.
But acc treats fsu like its 120,000 2013 Ferrari 460.
Why go to big 12 and be under Texas,Oklahoma, Oklahoma state. And Baylor is not cake walk In football either. If yall wanna take the money and run. Fine but i will miss fsu. Fsu vs Maryland game were always good fun. If fsu leaves the acc. Its going to be a sad day for me :(. Like having a cousin move away. -
HoopsCoach said...
Ummm.......I'm a UT fan. As a basketball coach myself, I have no problem with the ACC being a basketball 1st conference.
But, if I was a fan of any of the ACC football schools I would leave. Your t.v. deal is a joke. Do you realize that ESPN just gave you a deal for $17 million per school for EVERY football and basketball game, when last year they gave UT $15 million per year for it's scraps? To make it worse you won't see the $17 mil until 2021. So UT is actually going to make more off their tier 3 than any ACC school for it's Tier 1, 2, and 3 combined.
Trust me, I'm not trying to talk sh!* by throwing that out there. I just wanted you to see how bad the ACC deal is so you can understand why teams should want to leave.
You also can't have a championship program without playing great teams week in and week out. This is where the Big 12 and the ACC football schools need each other.
TerpsSoccer
- 4 stars Rating: 70
3192 votes total - (1728)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
ZZ1059 said...
That is a quite asinine thing to say. So the booster's have the money, but are withholding. Which in turn, will be reflected in our recruiting budget.
What we need is to stop bitching and start paying up. I do not care if you are only a 50.00 member, the more we get the more we will have.
And yes I can criticize people for not being a booster I am a silver chief.
"Sometimes when you bring the thunder, you get lost in the storm." -Kenny Powers
-
TerpsSoccer said...
Like if all people you should know this..football is not the #1 goal for universities. Your a leader if young people. I hope for their sake you push them to get all the education they can get. Saying football first acc schools should leave is just silly. That's like I saying Kansas , K stats and Baylor, Iowa state should leave the big 12, because their basketball schools. Makes no sense at all.
-
TerpsSoccer said...
Like if all people you should know this..football is not the #1 goal for universities. Your a leader if young people. I hope for their sake you push them to get all the education they can get. Saying football first acc schools should leave is just silly. That's like I saying Kansas , K stats and Baylor, Iowa state should leave the big 12, because their basketball schools. Makes no sense at all.
-
TerpsSoccer said...
I don't understand or get why fsu fans feel like you been wronged by the acc. Yes its a basketball first league. But acc treats fsu like its 120,000 2013 Ferrari 460. Why go to big 12 and be under Texas,Oklahoma, Oklahoma state. And Baylor is not cake walk In football either. If yall wanna take the money and run. Fine but i will miss fsu. Fsu vs Maryland game were always good fun. If fsu leaves the acc. Its going to be a sad day for me :(. Like having a cousin move away.
-
otown nole29245
- 4 stars Rating: 76
703 votes total - (1637)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4






President Barron's full email response