Unconquered

That's what I was thinking.

I like that he plays offense too... Will make him a better LB in the long run. I like how FSU goes after pure football players.

There's a reason none of the Big 3 have offered Deeb. You have to look at it as if you were a college coach, and not a fan, watching film, of what they do NOW.

Deeb is close to being as good as he's going to get. In other words, athletically, he's about tapped out. What you see, is what you get. His film says he's 6'3, but he's probably somewhere in the 6'0-6'2 range. He's already pushing mid-230's. Not an elite athlete by any means either. How much more weight can he put on without hurting his already average/above average-athleticism and hips already? He is a good high school player, and I love the way he hits people though. Old school style Mike right there.

Hoskins is a legitimate 6'3, was measured by the coaches at Junior Day. He has long arms, room to add good weight, without losing any of his athleticism or speed. His best days are ahead of him as a player, and there's a lot of room to develop him into a good college football player.

That's what makes Hoskins a better college football prospect than Michael Deeb.

Maybe so and I won't disagree. However, you cannot teach instincts, smarts and will. I think Deeb has all that no matter what his size is. Hoskins could turn out to be incredible and I am not denying him that. All I am saying is that Deeb is really going to make these teams pay if they continue to pass on him. He has all those things you cannot teach or train for.

Oh and to fsukum, I base nothing off rankings but on what I see on film. I don't pay attention to rankings or even see where guys are listed until close to signing day. Those things constantly change and have certain bias thrown in as well.