-
nolesfan8 said...
Copy and pasted from the findings of the Freeh report as issued in Louis Freeh's statement:
"In critical written correspondence that we uncovered on March 20th of this year, we see evidence of their proposed plan of action in February 2001 that included reporting allegations about Sandusky to the authorities. After Mr. Curley consulted with Mr. Paterno, however, they changed the plan and decided not to make a report to the authorities. Their failure to protect the February 9, 2001 child victim, or make attempts to identify him, created a dangerous situation for other unknown, unsuspecting young boys who were lured to the Penn State campus and football games by Sandusky and victimized repeatedly by him."
....
"Taking into account the available witness statements and evidence, it is more reasonable to conclude that, in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity, the most powerful leaders at Penn State University – Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley – repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky’s child abuse from the authorities, the Board of Trustees, Penn State community, and the public at large. Although concern to treat the child abuser humanely was expressly stated, no such sentiments were ever expressed by them for Sandusky’s victims."
....
"The evidence shows that Mr. Paterno was made aware of the 1998 investigation of Sandusky, followed it closely, but failed to take any action, even though Sandusky had been a key member of his coaching staff for almost 30 years, and had an office just steps away from Mr. Paterno’s."
....
"Based on the evidence, the only known, intervening factor between the decision made on February 25, 2001 by Messrs. Spanier, Curley and Schulz to report the incident to the Department of Public Welfare, and then agreeing not to do so on February 27th, was Mr. Paterno’s February 26th conversation with Mr. Curley."That's just a snippet of what is contained in the report. Any information contrary to what is stated above is false, unless you yourself are an investigative authority with access to PSU records.
This comes directly from the statement made by Mr. Freeh. This is not mindless media drivel.
cuznchips28
- 4 stars Rating: 68
1890 votes total - (4428)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
cuznchips28 said...
Yes and their is no record of that conversation between Curley and Joepa, so that proves nothing. Their failure to report didn't make Sandusky abuse anyone, reporting doesn't guarantee it stops either. That is just opinion, like in the report.
Yes he was aware of the 98 incident that was investigated by authorities and nothing came about it, why would joepa report that? Sandusky was cleared of any wrong doing at that point for the 98 incident. what action is there to take? Sandusky retired in 99.
There isn't much their showing joepa had any wrong doing. Should he have followed up, considering what happened after, yes, but that doesn't mean anything would have stopped.
This post was edited by Nole27 on 7/24/2012 at 12:43 PM

Honestly if Joe Pa were alive he would be headed to the...