Unconquered

Any undefeated BCS team should make it in over a 1 loss SEC team. There shouldn't be a second though. An SEC on be loss team shouldn't be "handed" a BCS championship spot like everyone seems to give them in the preseason. First of all, we are assuming there will be a one loss team out of the conference and second of all, what if the conference is average outside of one team at the end of the year? Do they still get the media bias from past accomplishment?

Look at 2006 and 2011 as examples. UF wouldn't have gone to the championship in 2006 had USC beaten UCLA (and USC already had 1 loss). Alabama wouldn't have gone to the championship in 2011 had Ok State beaten Baylor (based on SOS and conference RPI, Ok St. should have gone anyways).

Why create a harder gauntlet if you don't have to? We don't have to look far to find a perfect example of the danger of tough OOC games...read: last year. My question to you guys, would you feel better or worse about FSU if they had cupcake OOC's and were dominating the ACC and in the Orange Bowl with some consistency? This NC stuff is so random, it seems silly to try to plan it. I don't believe any NC claiber team consciously sets up a title run by scheduling hard OOC opponents. Simply set your team up for a double digit wins every year and win your conference. Just let the rest come to you.

Florida State was ranked Top 5 this year after losing a 3 year starting QB. 4 year Starting Guard and Center. If we go undefeated they will put us in the NC game. The fact that these questions have to be asked show that we have a terrible method of deciding our champion in D-1 CFB

Of the last 10 BCS national title teams, only three teams had 2 BCS teams on their non conf. 7 only had 1.

FSU has two on their WITHOUT WVU.

Silly to even speculate on the topic. FSU would be in the title game.