-
FSU3456FSUx0
- 5 stars Rating: 86
179 votes total - (1386)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TheOriginalBigL
- 4 stars Rating: 73
64 votes total - (108)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
abs_da_don ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
2702 votes total - (6502)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
StPete_Nole72037
- 5 stars Rating: 92
641 votes total - (2395)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
abs_da_don ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
2702 votes total - (6502)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lincoln Hawk ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
983 votes total - (2305)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Lincoln Hawk ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
983 votes total - (2305)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
NorthStarNole
- 5 stars Rating: 95
340 votes total - (920)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
googolplex said...
Number of reps at a lighter weight is not the same thing as raw strength for one rep. I weigh 168 and can do 60 push-ups without stopping. Not amazing, but it's considered very good for a 42-year-old. But I cannot get even a single rep, on bench press, at 135. I just have a combination of muscle fibers that is not well suited for high-weight single-reps. Nigel can probably bench 480 for one rep. He could well be tops for all the LBs.
NorthStarNole
- 5 stars Rating: 95
340 votes total - (920)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars








Combine: Nigel Bradham