-
StPete_Nole7203
- 5 stars Rating: 92
650 votes total - (2404)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
crw04d said...
All I'm asking for is a comparison to prior year by position group will we be better or worse in 2013?
OL - better, while we lose Watson we continue to gain experience across a young OL group
RB - same, although we lose CT which is a huge loss, we gain pender and green. I think LP will be a significant loss as well however the offensive calls can change a little bc we won't field a fb
Wr - better, Not losing a ton IMO and we are gaining a lot of speed and hopefully KN can pick it up
Te - better, same group more experience
Qb - worse, as much as I want to see Winston or Coker prove me wrong I have to believe there will be a drop off. Not impossible for one of them to come in and it all clicks but more often than not that doesn't happen
DL - worse, this is a result of losing Bjenk, Werner and tank. I still think we will dominate up front but losin that type of talent is impossible to say we don't feel it a little
LB - ?? Not to sure on this one
DB - better. Lose X but we have very capable players and we gain a more aggressive play caller. I think we see more ints
This post was edited by ScalpEm10 on 2/28/2013 at 12:46 PM
-
Chris Nee ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5732 votes total - Christopher Nee
- (17017)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
tlhwg ●
- 5 stars Rating: 83
426 votes total - Sean Millard
- (1239)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
delawarenole
- 5 stars Rating: 89
359 votes total - (1194)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
googolplex said...
OL: worse. Menelik was our best lineman and the drop off at RT could be disastrously large--literally from great to not being able to field a legit college tackle. The marginal improvement at the other OL positions won't make up for it.
QB: better. No, the QB won't be a better overall player than EJ was, but I think the fresh start of a young player not second-guessing himself will mean we get more playmaking out of the position, even from a more immature or mistake-prone player, and fewer untimely sacks.
RB: at least better than what we got after CT went down. Way better, actually. I think the coaching will improve. Not sure what was going on with Gran, I'm sure he is a good coach, maybe the wrong fit for the staff, maybe he was already headed elsewhere in his mind, but that position was out of synch with the offense a lot, and won't be going forward.
WR: I think what you see is what you get with Benjamin, but I bet somebody steps up and makes this position stronger.
DL: better. Not better players, but more playmaking as the beasts are turned a little more loose.
LB: way better.
DB: I bet better for reasons given by others.
TE: same. Maybe better blocking.
ST: way worse.
I think this will be a more exciting, more playmaking team. Maybe a better team overall. I still think it will lose 3-4 games simply because at Clemson and at UF they'll legitimately be facing better teams, possibly top 5 teams, in almost impossible-to-overcome stadiums. Plus I think we are stuck, indeed forever, with the annual 1 or 2 WTF losses to a team we should beat by 35, a phenomenon which has nothing to do with how good we are position-by-position.
-
phillip740il ●
- 5 stars Rating: 84
1237 votes total - (3475)
- 13 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Noles247 or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
Chris Nee of 247Sports.com. You can follow me on twitter @CNee247.
Chris Nee ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
5732 votes total - Christopher Nee
- (17017)
- 11 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
crw04d said...
All I'm asking for is a comparison to prior year by position group will we be better or worse in 2013?
OL - better, while we lose Watson we continue to gain experience across a young OL group
RB - same, although we lose CT which is a huge loss, we gain pender and green. I think LP will be a significant loss as well however the offensive calls can change a little bc we won't field a fb
Wr - better, Not losing a ton IMO and we are gaining a lot of speed and hopefully KN can pick it up
Te - better, same group more experience
Qb - worse, as much as I want to see Winston or Coker prove me wrong I have to believe there will be a drop off. Not impossible for one of them to come in and it all clicks but more often than not that doesn't happen
DL - worse, this is a result of losing Bjenk, Werner and tank. I still think we will dominate up front but losin that type of talent is impossible to say we don't feel it a little
LB - ?? Not to sure on this one
DB - better. Lose X but we have very capable players and we gain a more aggressive play caller. I think we see more ints
- This post is for members of Noles247 or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
-
tlhwg ●
- 5 stars Rating: 83
426 votes total - Sean Millard
- (1239)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ftworthnole4291
- 5 stars Rating: 88
81 votes total - (256)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars





Better or worse by position